Seems like Facebook Home, new launcher app for certain Android apps, will allow you to put updates from Facebook News Feed right onto your lock screen. While this brings Facebook to life for you, it isn’t exactly the safest. There are many reasons.
Let’s put it this way: adding a PIN code lock to your phone doesn’t keep people locked out of your Facebook account. People, even if they don’t access your phone, can still access the Facebook account on the lock screen, because the PIN code does not secure Facebook Home.
Maybe it’s a good idea to wait to use Facebook Home, so security features can be enhanced.
Do you have a phone enabled with Facebook Home and a PIN code? Let me know, comment below!
As usual for Patch Tuesday, many security updates were issued. I’m here to provide all the details for these critical updates. Not only did Windows get patched, but Adobe Flash and Shockwave Players did too.
Microsoft released a span of nine patch bundles, plugging security holes in Windows and other products. Separately, Adobe did its usual thing, and took part in Patch Tuesday as well for updates to Adobe Flash and Shockwave Players.
A cumulative update was made to Internet Explorer, which fixed two critical vulnerabilities present in almost all versions of Internet Explorer (in history). It should be noted that this includes IE 9 and 10.
Either you will receive Automatic Updates, if you’ve set Windows up to do so. Otherwise, go to Start, search Windows Update. Or for Windows 8, search for Windows Update on the Start screen.
Other than that, Adobe brings an update to Adobe Flash Player for Windows and Mac to v. 11.7.700.169. Linux should be updated to 184.108.40.2060. Android 4.x+: 220.127.116.11 and 2.x-3.x: 18.104.22.168.
Keep in mind that Google Chrome and Internet Explorer 10 (Windows 8) automatically update Flash Player on their own.
Shockwave Player should be updated as well to v. 22.214.171.124! For these updates, go to www.Adobe.com
You should be able to update to Adobe AIR, which will help secure your computer even further from vulnerability. If you have Adobe AIR installed, which is required for quite a few programs that are built on its architecture (such as Tweetdeck, Pandora Internet Radio, games, etc.). AIR should automatically prompt to update.
Firefox 20 was just released yesterday, marking also the 15th anniversary. 3 critical, 11 total security fixes are in Ff 20. Also, new private browsing updates were made as well as the ability to close hanging plugins without the browser hanging.
Mozilla detailed the security fixes, which includes the critical and high risk categories:
- CRITICAL: MFSA 2013-30 Miscellaneous memory safety hazards (rv:20.0 / rv:17.0.5)
- CRITICAL: MFSA 2013-35 WebGL crash with Mesa graphics driver on Linux
- CRITICAL: MFSA 2013-36 Bypass of SOW protections allows cloning of protected nodes
- HIGH: MFSA 2013-31 Out-of-bounds write in Cairo library
- HIGH: MFSA 2013-32 Privilege escalation through Mozilla Maintenance Service
- HIGH: MFSA 2013-34 Privilege escalation through Mozilla Updater
- HIGH: MFSA 2013-38 Cross-site scripting (XSS) using timed history navigations
Other than all that, there were more performance tweaks, as usual, as well as much improved HTML5 tools.
Mozilla is planning to fixes in Ff 21: known HTML5 video bug on being able to use copy actions, browsing and download history pairing, and function keys that don’t work when pressed. Other info on updates and issues, look here.
In Firefox, if you’re not automatically prompted to update, then do so as soon as possible by clicking the Firefox tab at the top left corner of the browser, hovering over Help >, click on About Firefox. You may also have to click Check for updates in the window that pops up. You should be patched.
Once you install Firefox, it will ask to restart your browser. Please allow it to do so, in order for it to finish updating and get you secure and well on your way in the dangers of the Internet.
Feel free to comment at any time.
South Korea, unbelievably will be stepping up partnership with the US, as North Korea becomes a more emerging threat (after declaring war late last week). Seems like North Korea, recently, has made its intentions known to attack the United States and South Korea. Although it may not seem like a large attack, we must still keep guard.
A news agency in South Korea identified that its defense ministry is planning to increase their forces and attempt to deter any further attacks. A customized deterrence strategy is in the works between the US and South Korea. Therefore, it plans to begin military drills sometime late this Summer (some are thinking August).
It’s hoped that South Korea could also aid as an ally, especially if it means the US has to battle North Korea in the future. Although this is like a small dog yapper trying to intimidate a big dog, a pre-meditated terror plot, like Al-Qaeda, is nothing to sneeze at.
The cyberwar continues to step it up little-by-little, but it seems like things have slowed a bit. Which is never a good sign, usually, because slowing down activity means that they are just meditating on a much bigger or more planned attack, and to take the US by surprise.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) researchers have uncovered a serious reality in the Stuxnet case against Iran (brought on by the US and Israel). NATO’s researchers call it an “act of force”, which was apparently an illegal move.
“Acts that kill or injure persons or destroy or damage objects are unambiguously uses of force” and likely violate international law, according to the Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, a study produced by international legal experts at the request of NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defense Center of Excellence in Estonia.
Apparently, it is prohibited, “according to the U.N. charter, the use of force is prohibited, except in self-defense,” says Michael N. Schmitt, a lead author on The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare.
According to the Washington Times, The international group of researchers who wrote the manual were unanimous that Stuxnet — the self-replicating cyberweapon that destroyed Iranian centrifuges that were enriching uranium — was an act of force, said Mr. Schmitt, professor of international law at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, R.I.
Also, the article stated that neither Israel nor the United States has publicly acknowledged being behind Stuxnet, but anonymous U.S. national security officials have told news outlets that the two countries worked together to launch the attack, which set the Iranian nuclear program back as much as two years, according to some estimates.
A manual produced by 20 researchers in NATO, as well as some legal scholars and senior military lawyers, details 300 pages worth of important cybersecurity analysis.
“We wrote it as an aid to legal advisers to governments and militaries, almost a textbook,” Schmitt told the paper. “We wanted to create a product that would be useful to states to help them decide what their position is. We were not making recommendations, we did not define best practice, we did not want to get into policy,” he said.
More detailed investigation is probable in this matter.
Richard Stallman, the pioneer of free software, has asked a South American free software association to not promote Ubuntu at any event, giving reasons that it “spies on its users” by collecting desktop search activity, and then handing it over to Amazon.
Canonical, developers of Ubuntu, a Linux-based operating system, released version 12.10 with the desktop search last October. Users can opt out of this, in which Canonical claims it retrieves anonymous user data, which is shared with third parties.
After calling Ubuntu spyware, it seems it might be a ridiculous banter by Stallman. It may not be spyware, but it’s no surprise any software collects data. Wouldn’t you be shocked if you found out software didn’t collect data?
A lot of heated criticism has been over this desktop search, however, Stallman’s request was declined. The FLISOL event organizer stated that users should have freedom of choice. As we know, limited freedom of choice is bad when it comes to software.
Whether Stallman wants Ubuntu promoted anymore is irrelevant to the fact that Ubuntu is one of the fastest growing distros of Linux.